Trump’s foreign licensing business booms to $59.5 million as Gulf developers pay

Zakana

New member
Joined
Aug 9, 2026
Messages
56
news_image.jpg

PresidentDonald Trump'sforeign real-estate licensing business boomed during his first year back in office, generating $59.5 million in 2025 as international developers paid a premium to brandluxury towers,golf coursesandcoastal resortswith the Trump name.

Foreign licensing revenue, including for the use of the Trump name on properties around the world, rose 71% from 2024. The sum was nearly 10 times higher than in 2023, according to a CNBC analysis of Trump'sannual financial disclosure— fueled by the Trump Organization's reversal of the company's first-term pledge to pursue "no new foreign deals whatsoever."

The Trump Organization's second-termethics policybars new material transactions with foreign governments but allows deals with private foreign companies

Four Trump-affiliated licensing LLCs not listed in his 2024 disclosure generated $20.25 million in 2025, accounting for 82% of the increase. Five other licensing LLCs that had previously been listed as inactive generated another $9.64 million.

More than 60% of the licensing income came from projects inGulf countries.

Some of those developers licensing the Trump namewere pursuingmajor U.S. investments, seeking government permits or pressing for favorable economic and diplomatic relations. Other Trump-branded projects relied on state-owned land, sovereign investment or partnerships with government-controlled companies.

The result, ethics watchdogs told CNBC, is an unprecedented collision between thepresident's public power and private wealth. The deals also raise unresolved questions, legal experts told CNBC, about the Constitution'sForeign Emoluments Clause.

CNBC found no evidence that any licensing payment influenced an administration decision, that a developer received special treatment or that Trump intervened on a company's behalf.

The Trump Organization told CNBC it operates "completely separate from the presidency," complies with ethics and conflict-of-interest laws and uses an outside ethics adviser to avoid conflicts. The Trump Organization did not respond to questions about specific projects involving foreign licensing.

Asked about Trump’s foreign dealmaking, a White House spokesperson did not address the arrangements directly. The spokesperson said “the only special interest guiding” Trump’s decisions is “the best interest of the American people” and pointed to more than $2 trillion in investment commitments and commercial, defense, aviation and technology deals announced during the president'sMay 2025 Gulf trip.

"Foreign governments and politically connected businesses now have a direct, incredibly visible way to put money into the sitting president's pocket," saidScott Greytak, deputy executive director of Transparency International U.S., an anti-corruption nonprofit.

"The conflict is already in plain sight right now," Greytak told CNBC. "We don't need to wait for some kind of smoking gun to see a quid pro quo."

Eric TrumptoldThe New York Timesin 2024 that the family "did everything imaginable to avoid any appearance of impropriety" and "got crushed anyway." He continued, saying, "We can't just sit out in perpetuity, and I won't."

Donald Trump was blunter about the foreign deals, tellingThe Timesin January, "I found out that nobody cared. I'm allowed to."

Gulf developers expand in the U.S.

Projects linked to theUnited Arab Emiratesgenerated roughly $22 million in licensing income for Trump in 2025, followed bySaudi Arabiawith $9 million andQatarwith $5 million.

Much of that revenue flowed through two Gulf real-estate developers: Saudi-linkedDar Al Arkanand UAE-basedDamac.

Trump reported $25.8 million tied to projects involving Dar Al Arkan and its Dubai-based international arm, Dar Global. Damac-linked projects generated another $11.3 million.

Under the licensing model, local developers generally finance and build the properties, while the Trump Organization collects fees for use of its name and, in some cases, for managing them.

The deals come amid a Gulf-region boom in branded residences, which use luxury and celebrity names to command premium prices. In Dubai, for instance, branded-home transaction volume rose 26% year over year during the first nine months of 2025, while sales value climbed 51%,according to commercial real estate services and investment company CBRE, using its most recent available information.

The Trump name offers something other luxury and celebrity brands cannot: the suggestion of access to the power of the presidency.

Critics likeBen Freeman, director of the Democratizing Foreign Policy program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said being associated with Trump's brand can signal political access when a developer — or its government — has interests before Washington. The think tank advocates for diplomacy rather than military intervention.

"Is this an America First foreign policy, or is this a Trump First foreign policy?" Freeman told CNBC.

Damac offers an example of that overlap, ethics experts said.

Its $11.3 million in licensing payments included two newly disclosed $5 million fees tied to Damac's Abu Dhabi projects, even though the Trump Organization has no active developments there. That is possible because developers can pay for the contractual right to use the Trump brand before a project is built — including through up-front or milestone-based fees.

The payments came as Damac, founded by billionaireHussain Sajwani, pursued a major U.S. expansion.

In January 2025,Sajwani joined then president-elect Trumpat Mar-a-Lago to announce plans to invest at least$20 billioninU.S. data centers. Trump praised the commitment and said companies investing at least $1 billion would receive expedited environmental and regulatory reviews.

Sajwani, alongtime friend of Trump, told CNBC at the time that "the sky is the limit" when it came to U.S. investment.

Six months later,Trump signed an executive orderdirecting federal agencies toaccelerate permittingfor qualifying data centers and the energy infrastructure supporting them.

The policy applied broadly, and Damac soon advanced a major data-center project that could qualify for expedited federal permitting and other support under the order.
 
Back
Top